The High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging a Civil Judge's order rejecting a plaint by order under Section 96 of the CPC. The Court held the writ petition was not maintainable as the order was appealable under law. No relief was granted.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
WP227 No. 510 of 2019
Pradumn Patel S/o Manohar Lalaged, Aged about 28 years, Caste Patel, Occupation Agriculturist, R/o Village Chaple, Tahsil Kharsiya, District Raigarh, Chhattisgarh.
---- Petitioner Versus
| ----Respondents | |
|---|---|
| For Petitioner : |
Mr. Ram Kumar Tiwari, Advocate |
| For Respondent No. 1 : | Mr. Abhishek Saraf, Advocate |
| For State : |
Mr. Akash Pandey, Panel Lawyer |
Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal Order On Board
07.08.2019
2
copy thereof.
Sd/(Sanjay K. Agrawal) Judge
Harneet
1 issue framed by the court
Whether a writ petition challenging an order under Section 96 of the CPC which is statutorily appeals under Order 7 Rule 11 CPC is maintainable before the High Court under Article 226 of the Constitut
Pradumn Patel
State of Chhattisgarh
Sanjay K. Agrawal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
