Allowed

Anwar Hussain v. Mohammad Hussain

Chhattisgarh HC21 Jun 2019WP227/488/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Chhattisgarh set aside impugned orders of the trial Court which had closed the petitioner's opportunity to examine four listed witnesses. The Court directed the trial Court to allow the petitioner to examine the witnesses and conclude the trial within three months.

What did the court decide?

Impugned orders set aside; opportunity to examine four listed witnesses given; trial to be concluded within three months.

Anwar Hussain Vs Mohammad Hussain — Civil Procedure and Limitation | Chhattisgarh HC (2019)

¶1

¶2

NAFR

¶3

HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR

¶4

WP227 No. 488 of 2019

¶5

Anwar Hussain S/o Julfikar Hussain, aged about 52 years, R/o Mova, Bhimrao Ambedkar Ward, Ward No. 27, Raipur, Tahsil & District Raipur, Chhattisgarh.

¶6

---- Petitioner Versus

¶7

Mohammad Hussain, aged about 47 years, S/o Mohammad Haquim, Occupation Business, R/o Jarhi Road, Bhatgaon, Tahsil & District Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh.

¶8

State of Chhattisgarh, Through The Collector, Raipur, Tahsil & District Raipur, Chhattisgarh.

¶9

--- Respondents

¶10

For Petitioner : Mr. Sourabh Sharma, Advocate For State : Mr. Apurv Goyal, Panel Lawyer

¶11

Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal Order On Board

¶12

21.06.2019

¶13

Vide impugned orders dated 03/05/2019 and 20/03/2019 passed in Civil Suit No. 8-A/2011, learned trial Court, by rejecting petitioner's application has closed his opportunity to lead four listed witnesses.

¶14

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that all those four witnesses are listed witnesses and trial Court is absolutely unjustified in closing petitioner's opportunity to examine the said witnesses by the impugned orders.

¶15

After hearing learned counsel for the petitioner and looking to the fact that the witnesses are listed witnesses and it is necessary to get these witnesses examined for the just and proper disposal of the civil suit, impugned orders are set aside. As they are listed witnesses, opportunity is given to the petitioner to examine them.

¶16

¶17

Process fee must be paid on or before 26^th June, 2019. On the said date, learned trial Court would issue process to them subject to payment of Rs. 3000/- to respondent No. 1. The State counsel appearing in that suit would do well to secure their presence on the next date of hearing. Learned trial Court is directed to hear and conclude the trial within three months from the date of receipt of copy of this order.

¶18

A copy of this order be sent to the concerned trial Court by e- mail/fax. No cost(s).

¶19

Sd/(Sanjay K. Agrawal) Judge

¶20

Harneet

Anwar Hussain v. Mohammad Hussain

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Anwar Hussain v. Mohammad Hussain

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Kanta Swai Vs State Of Chhattisgarh

Raghvendra Singh Kshatri Vs State Of Chhattisgarh And Ors.

Daduram Sidar Vs State Of Chhattisgarh

Sonu Chandravanshi Vs State Of Chhattisgarh

Ravindra Kishore Vs Shashikant Tiwari and Anr.

Rajesh Patel And Ors. Vs State Of Chhattisgarh