Petitioner's counsel submitted the matter was infructuous. The court dismissed the writ petition as infructuous without substantive engagement.
The petition is dismissed as having become infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH , BILASPUR
Order Sheet
WP No. 41 of 2003.
Satya Prakash Verma V. State of Chhattisgarh & Ors.
| 06.02.2019 | Ms. Upasana Mehta, Advocate for petitioner. |
|---|---|
| Mr. Jitendra Pali, Dy.A.G. for the State. The counsel for the petitioner submits that the matter has since become infructuous. |
|
| Accordingly, the petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. | |
| Sd/- | |
| (P. Sam Koshy) | |
| JUDGE |
Sumit
Satya Prakash Verma
State of Chhattisgarh
P. Sam Koshy
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
