Virendra Billaiya v. State of Chhattisgarh and Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
The court dismissed the writ petition as infructuous after 16 years due to the revocation of the impugned suspension order and the petitioner's repatriation.
The court dismissed the writ petition as infructuous after 16 years due to the revocation of the impugned suspension order and the petitioner's repatriation.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
WP No. 2203 of 2003
---- Petitioner
Versus
---- Respondent
For Petitioner : Shri BP Sharma, Advocate. For Respondent/State : Shri Sudeep Verma, Deputy GA.
Hon'ble Shri Justice Prashant Kumar Mishra
Order On Board
18/02/2019 :
2
have been rendered infructuous.
Sd/Judge (Prashant Kumar Mishra)
Barve
Virendra Billaiya
State Of Chhattisgarh
Prashant Kumar Mishra
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court