The Chhattisgarh High Court permitted the withdrawal of a writ appeal challenging the admission of a daily wage employee to a permanent post, without addressing the merits of the dispute on record.
Permission granted to withdraw the writ appeal and the application for condonation of delay
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
Writ Appeal No. 443 of 2019
---- Appellants
Versus
---- Respondent
For Appellants/State : Shri Sudeep Agrawal, Deputy Advocate General.
Hon'ble Shri P. R. Ramachandra Menon, Chief Justice Hon'ble Shri Justice Parth Prateem Sahu, Judge Judgment on Board
Per P. R. Ramachandra Menon, Chief Justice
05.11.2019
2
law laid down by this Court in the case of Govind and others vs. State of C.G. and others reported in 2007 (2) C.G.L.J. 29 , which is stated as governing the field. The appeal is belated by 253 days and hence it is sought to be condoned by filing an application (IA No. 1 of 2019) in this regard.
State of Andhra Pradesh and others vs. G.M. Morey reported in (1982) 2 SCC 436 .
Sd/Sd/-
(P. R. Ramachandra Menon) (Parth Prateem Sahu)
Brijmohan
State of Chhattisgarh
Bismat Bai
P. R. Ramachandra Menon
Parth Prateem Sahu
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
