Budhram v. Sudhlal
Case brief
What is this about?
This High Court dismissed a writ appeal challenging a Single Judge's verdict. The court declined non-interference, noting the Single Judge relied on the availability of an alternate remedy under the Chhattisgarh Land Revenue Code.
What did the court decide?
Interference declined. Appeal dismissed.
What the court decided
1
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
Writ Appeal No. 351 of 2018
{Arising out of Order dated 12.02.2018 passed in Writ Petition (C) No. 128 of 2018 by the learned Single Judge}
Budhram S/o Pardeshi Sahu, aged about 45 years, R/o Pandripani, Tahsil Nagri, District Dhamtari, Chhattisgarh.
---- Appellant
Versus
- Sudhlal S/o Pardeshi Ram Sahu, aged about 52 years, R/o Pandripani, Tahsil Nagri, District Dhamtari, Chhattisgarh.
- Tahsildar, Nagri, District Dhamtari, Chhattisgarh.
- The Collector, Dhamtari, District Dhamtari, Chhattisgarh.
---- Respondents For Appellant : Shri Kunal Das, Advocate. For Respondent No. 2 and 3 : Shri Faiz Kazi, Panel Lawyer
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Budhram S/o Pardeshi Sahu
- respondent
Sudhlal S/o Pardeshi Ram Sahu
- respondent
Tahsildar, Nagri
- respondent
The Collector, Dhamtari
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Chhattisgarh HC
- Decided on
- · May
- Registered
- Case no.
- WA/351/2018
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court