In this second appeal, the High Court of Chhattisgarh dismissed the appeal in limine without notice. The single-judge bench held that the finding that the respondents lacked title due to missing evidence of a sale deed was not perverse, and no substantial question of law arose.
Second appeal dismissed in limine without notice to other side.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
SA No. 540 of 2005
Usha Devi W/o Arja Prasad Dubey, Aged about 45 years, R/o Vill. Chandaini, Tah. & Distt. Kawardha (C.G.)
---- Appellant/ Defendant No.2
Versus
For Appellant/ Defendant No.2 : Mr. Avinash Chaubey, Advocate.
Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal
Order On Board
15.03.2019
2
Sd/-
(Sanjay K. Agrawal) Judge
Pawan
1 issue framed by the court
Whether a substantial question of law arises from the first appellate Court's finding that the executing defendants lack title over the suit land due to absence of a sale deed from the deceased vendor
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Usha Devi W/o Arja Prasad Dubey
Mahant Rambali Das Guru Late Mangal Das
Sukrat Bai Widow of Chhotelal
Sanjay K. Agrawal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
