Skip to content

The research platform for Indian law — judgements, legislation and the citations between them. Free to search, with the original document behind every result.

A product of LawSathi.

Research

Search Legislation Research tools

Browse

Courts Case types Topics Most-cited judgements Sources

LawSathi

Practice platform Blog

© 2026 LawSathiTerms PrivacyResearch aid, not the official record.

Arif Ali Vs Nizam and Another — Civil Procedure and Limitation | Chhattisgarh HC (2019)

Home
Chhattisgarh HC
2019
Arif Ali Vs Nizam and AnotherArif Ali v. Nizam and Another

Dismissed

Arif Ali v. Nizam and Another

Chhattisgarh HC4 Jul 2019SA/272/2007

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Second appeal dismissed as appellant's counsel had no instructions.

What did the court decide?

Second appeal dismissed for want of prosecution.

What the court decided

AI extract

A

1

NAFR

HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR

SA No. 272 of 2007

Arif Ali, son of Shri Hazari Musalman, aged about 55 years, Resident of Moharpara, Manendragarh, District Koriya, Chhattisgarh.

---Appellant

Versus

(a) Nizam, son of Nabi Hussain, aged about 50 years.

(b). Sahabuddin, son of Nabi Hussain, aged about 43 years.

Both R/o Moharpara, Manendragarh, District Koriya, Chhattisgarh.

State of Chhattisgarh, Through the Collector, Koriya.

---- Respondents

Parties & counsel

AI extract

appellant
Arif Ali
respondent
Nizam
respondent
Sahabuddin
respondent
State of Chhattisgarh

Coram

AI extract

Case details

As recorded by the court registry

Court: Chhattisgarh HC
Decided on: 4 Jul 2019 · July
Registered: 23 Jul 2007
Case no.: SA/272/2007

Similar cases

Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court

Finding judgements on the same questions…

More from Sanjay K. Agrawal

Nadi Vs Shivlal
3 Jul 2019
Bulchu and Oth. Vs Nirmal and Others
3 Jul 2019
Budhara @ Manbodh Vs Nandu
3 Jul 2019
Aganiya Bai and Others Vs Ganga Ram and Another
4 Jul 2019

Cite this judgement

Arif Ali v. Nizam and Another, SA/272/2007 (CG), decided on 4 July 2019.

The High Court of Chhattisgarh publishes no neutral citation for this judgement — cite it by case number and date of decision.

Bench / Coram

Sanjay K. Agrawal

Parties & counsel

Outcome

Second appeal dismissed for want of prosecution.

Detailed headnote1 paragraphs

Order dismissing a second appeal for want of prosecution where the appellant's counsel has no instructions from the appellant to appear.

A compact analysis

This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.

For Appellant : Ms. G.K. Chawla on behalf of Ms. Sharmila Singhai, Advocates For State : Mr. Saleem Kazi, Deputy Advocate General

Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal Order on Board

04/07/2019

Counsel for the appellant pleads no instructions.

In view of the above, as the appellant's counsel has no instructions from the appellant, this Court has no other option but to dismiss the second appeal for want of prosecution.

Accordingly, the second appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution.

Sd/-

(Sanjay K. Agrawal) Judge

Harneet

Sanjay K. Agrawal

CNR

CGHC010002222007

Topic

Civil Procedure and Limitation

Bench

Sanjay K. Agrawal

Disposal

DISMISSED

Deopatiya and Others Vs Ramavtar and Others

4 Jul 2019

Gavheen@Yasoda Bai Thr.Lrs. Ram Kishan Vs Mahesh Ram and Other

4 Jul 2019