In a second appeal filed by the legal heirs of the deceased plaintiff, the High Court dismissed the appeal for want of prosecution and because the sole respondent had died, resulting in abatement.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
Second Appeal No.243 of 2004
Chhote Ram, S/o Bhuvneshwar Prasad Patel, Aged about 65 years, (dead) … His legal heirs.
All are R/o Village Kulba, Police Station, Tehsil & Distt. Raigarh (C.G.)
(Plaintiffs) ---- Appellants
Versus
Paharu Soura, S/o Dhondal Soura, Aged about 50 years, Occupation Agriculture, R/o Village Kulba, Tehsil & Distt. Raigarh (C.G.)
(Defendant) ---- Respondents
For Appellants: None present. For Respondent: Mr. R.S. Patel, Advocate.
Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal
Order On Board
20/08/2019
Sd/(Sanjay K. Agrawal) Judge
Soma
Chhote Ram and others
Paharu Soura
Sanjay K. Agrawal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
