In an appeal filed by the Appellants against a decision involving the State of Chhattisgarh, the Learned Judge held that the parties had settled the dispute as per instructions from local counsel. Consequently, the appeal was treated as withdrawn and allowed by dismissing the same.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
SA No. 165 of 2005
---- Appellants
Versus
3 (A) to 3 (C) are minors through their natural guardian mother Smt. Shanti Bai, W/o late Jayaram Gond, All R/o Village Mode, Tahsil & District Kanker (North Bastar) Chhattisgarh
No.4-A, 4-D and 4-E are minors, through their natural guardian mother Ram Bai, W/o late Jay Singh Gond, all R/o Village – Mode, Tahsil & District – Kanker (North Bastar) Chhattisgarh.
---- Respondents
For Appellant : Shri R.N.Jha, Advocate
S.B.: Hon'ble Shri Justice Manindra Mohan Shrivastava
Order On Board
03/07/2019
Learned counsel for the appellant submits that he has received instructions from the local counsel that the parties have settled their dispute. Therefore, at this stage, he does not wish to press this appeal.
The appeal is accordingly dismissed as withdrawn.
Sd/- ( Manindra Mohan Shrivastava ) Judge
Deepti
K Dulari Bai and others
State of Chhattisgarh
Manindra Mohan Shrivastava
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
