The applicant sought review of a prior order involving withholding of consent. The High Court condoned the delay in filing the review petition but allowed no improver of the underlying decision.
Delay in filing review petition is condoned; review petition is dismissed in limine without notice and without cost.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
REVP No. 91 of 2019
Chandrawati Sahu W/o Late Shri Panch Ram Sahu, aged about 65 years, R/o Village Megha, Tahsil Kurud, District Dhamtari Chhattisgarh
---- Applicant
Versus
---- Respondents
For Applicant : Mr. Shivang Dubey, Advocate. For Respondent No. 2 to 4 : Mr. Ghanshyam Patel, Government Advocate
Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal
Order On Board
17/06/2019
2
and is hereby dismissed in limine , without notice to other side. No
cost(s).
Sd/-
(Sanjay K. Agrawal)
Judge
Pawan
2 issues framed by the court
Whether condonation of delay in filing a review petition is justified.
Whether any error is apparent on the face of record in the impugned order.
Chandrawati Sahu
Chiranjeev Lal Soni
The Collector
Naib Tahsildar
Shri G.S. Uike
Sanjay K. Agrawal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
