This single-judge bench allowed an anticipatory bail application preferring a petition filed under Section 438 Cr.P.C. citing the long-standing relationship and age of the prosecutrix as reasons for a fit case.
Anticipatory bail granted via personal bond of Rs. 25,000 with one surety, subject to conditions of availableness and non-interference.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Page No.1
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
MCRCA No. 826 of 2019
---- Applicant
Versus
---- Respondent
For Applicant : Mr. Raza Ali, Advocate. For Respondent : Mr. Lav Sharma, Panel Lawyer. For Objector : Mr. Shivendu Pandya, Advocate.
Hon'ble Shri Justice Rajendra Chandra Singh Samant Order On Board
25/06/2019
Page No.2
applicant under the pressure given by her parents, hence, it is prayed that he may be enlarged on anticipatory bail.
Page No.3
on anticipatory bail.
Sd/-
Nisha
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the applicant is eligible for anticipatory bail in a case involving sexual offences under allegations of false implication.
Whether the relationship between the applicant and the prosecutrix establishes a fit case for anticipatory bail.
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Vikas Pandey
State of Chhattisgarh
Rajendra Chandra Singh Samant
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
