The High Court of Chhattisgarh allowed an application for anticipatory bail, noting that the complainant had appeared before the lower court and expressed no objection to the grant of bail.
Anticipatory bail granted; application to execute a personal bond of Rs. 25,000/- with one surety.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
-1-
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
MCRCA No. 1545 of 2018
---- Applicant
Versus
---- Non-applicant
For Applicant – Shri Badruddin Khan, Advocate. For Non-applicant/State – Shri Lav Sharma, Panel Lawyer.
Hon'ble Shri Justice Rajendra Chandra Singh Samant Order on Board
23-01-2019
3 . Learned counsel for the State/non-applicant opposes the application submitting that this applicant is named in the FIR and the statement under Section 161 of the Cr.P.C. by the complainant alleging his participation in the offence, hence, the application may be rejected.
4 . Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the case diary.
-2-
Sd/- (Rajendra Chandra Singh Samant) Judge
Aadil
1 issue framed by the court
Whether anticipatory bail can be granted to the applicant who apprehends arrest in connection with alleged offences of obscene acts, criminal intimidation, hurt, and forcible detention.
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Nijamuddin @ Hussain
State Of Chhattisgarh
Rajendra Chandra Singh Samant
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
