Sumeet Kewat v. State of Chhattisgarh
Case brief
What is this about?
Application in habeas corpus proceedings was dismissed as infructuous because the applicant had already been arrested.
Application in habeas corpus proceedings was dismissed as infructuous because the applicant had already been arrested.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
MCRCA No. 1321 of 2019
---- Applicant
Versus
---- Respondent
For Applicant : Shri Shyam Sunder Lal Tekchandani, Advocate For Respondent/State : Shri Alok Nigam, G.A.
Hon'ble Shri Justice Arvind Singh Chandel
Order On Board
03/12/2019
Sd/-
(Arvind Singh Chandel)
Judge
Prakash
Sumeet Kewat
State Of Chhattisgarh
Arvind Singh Chandel
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court