The High Court of Chhattisgarh rejected an application for anticipatory bail filed under Section 438 CrPC in a case alleging repeated rape. The court held the offence was serious and declined bail.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
M.Cr.C.(A) No. 1125 of 2019
Vivek Das, aged about 22 years, S/o Kaushal Das, Caste Panika, R/o Village Thathari, Police Station Baradwar, Tahsil Jaijaipur, District Janjgir Champa (CG).
---- Applicant
Versus
State of Chhattisgarh, through District Magistrate, District Janjgir Champa, Police Station Baradwar, District Janjgir Champa (CG).
---- Non-applicant For Applicant : Ms. Nirupama Bajpai, Advocate For Non-applicant : Mr. Ravi Maheshari, Panel Lawyer For Objector : Mr. Vikas Shrivastava, Advocate
Hon'ble Shri Justice Sharad Kumar Gupta Order On Board
04.10.2019
2
Sd/-
(Sharad Kumar Gupta) JUDGE
L/-
2 issues framed by the court
Whether anticipatory bail should be granted under Section 438 CrPC in a case alleging repeated sexual intercourse on an innocent girl under the pretext of marriage.
Whether the seriousness of the offence and its impact on society preclude the grant of anticipatory bail.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Vivek Das
Sharad Kumar Gupta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
