Dismissed

Hithlesh @ Mithlesh v. State of Chhattisgarh

Chhattisgarh HC5 Mar 2019MCRC/7898/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Chhattisgarh rejected this third bail application filed by an accused under Section 439 Cr.P.C. for offences under Sections 307 IPC and Arms Act, finding no change of circumstances to justify reconsideration of previous rejections though directing the Trial Court to conclude trial.

What did the court decide?

Bail application stands rejected; Trial Court directed to conclude trial at the earliest.

Hithlesh @ Mithlesh Vs State of Chhattisgarh — Murder and Culpable Homicide | Chhattisgarh HC (2019)

¶1

¶2

NAFR

¶3

HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR

¶4

MCRC No. 7898 of 2018

¶5

Hithlesh @ Mithlesh S/o Kapil Sai Aged About 23 Years R/o Village Girwarganj (Bairpara) P. S. And District Surajpur Chhattisgarh, District : Surajpur, Chhattisgarh

¶6

---- Petitioner

¶7

Versus

¶8

State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Station House Officer, Police Station Surajpur, District Surajpur, Chhattisgarh, District : Surajpur, Chhattisgarh

¶9

---- Respondent

¶10

For applicants	: Ms. Ranjana Singh Tomar, Advocate.
For resp./State	: Shri Rahul Mishra, Dy.GA.

¶11

Hon ' ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy Order on Board

¶12

05/03/2019

¶13

The present is a third bail application. The applicant has preferred this

¶14

bail application under Section 439 of Cr.P.C. in connection with Crime No. 264/2018 registered at Police Station Surajpur, District- Surajpur

¶15

(C.G.) for the offence punishable under Sections 307 of I.P.C. and Section 25/27 of Arms Act.

¶16

Present applicant is in jail since 29/06/2017.

¶17

The previous two bail applications stood rejected on 06/12/2017 and

¶18

04/07/2018. The repeat bail application has been filed only on the ground of delay in the conclusion of the Trial Court.

¶19

Having perused the previous two rejection orders, it reflects that the evidence adduced during the course of trial and also taking into

¶20

¶21

consideration the role attributed upon the present applicant in commission of the offence, this Court does not find any change of

¶22

circumstances as of now for reconsidering the claim of the petitioner for

¶23

grant of bail. Accordingly the present bail application stands rejected.

¶24

However, the Trial Court is directed to ensure that the trial is concluded

¶25

at the earliest considering the period of custody of the present applicant.

¶26

With the aforesaid observations, the bail application stands rejected.

Sd/-

(P. Sam Koshy)

JUDGE

Rohit

Hithlesh @ Mithlesh v. State of Chhattisgarh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Hithlesh @ Mithlesh v. State of Chhattisgarh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Manoj Kumar Singh and Ors. Vs State Of C.g. and Ors.

Jagjeet Singh Badesha Vs Shri K.C. Yadav (I.F.S.)

Dr.a.R.Rathore Vs State of Chhattisgarh and Ors.

Amir Singh Vs State of Chhattisgarh

Lalit Kurre Vs State of Chhattisgarh

Balchand Kachhawaha and Ors. Vs State of Chhattisgarh and Ors.