The High Court of Chhattisgarh rejected the applicant's third bail application under Section 439 Cr.P.C. involving charges of fraud and illegal medical practice. The Court held that after two prior rejections, considering the prima facie case and the evidence, this was not a fit case for release on bail.
Bail application rejected.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
MCRC No. 7588 of 2019
---- Applicant
Versus
---- Non-applicant
For Applicant : Shri Mahesh Gahlot, Advocate. For Non-applicant : Shri D.C. Verma, Government Advocate
Hon'ble Shri Justice Sharad Kumar Gupta
Order On Board
11.12.2019
2
Registration No. 1030 was mentioned. As per the letter of the Registrar, Chhattisgarh Medical Council, Raipur applicant is not registered in Chhattisgarh Medical Council. Her degree is not recognized by Union of India, she cannot do medical practice in Chhattisgarh.
Sd/-
(Sharad Kumar Gupta) JUDGE
kishore
3 issues framed by the court
Whether the applicant is entitled to release on bail in this third bail application under Section 439 Cr.P.C. considering the serious nature of the offences and prior rejections.
Whether the non-production of the seized flex dominates and excretes the necessity to grant bail in the third instance.
Consideration of the prima facie case and the litigation round to determine fitness for bail.
3 provisions across 3 enactments
Shanu Masih W/o Shri Sudesh Masih
State Of Chhattisgarh
Sharad Kumar Gupta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
