Two bail applications under CrPC 439 were rejected. The High Court held that while hostile witnesses are material, the seriousness of the N.D.P.S. charge and seized quantity outweighed procedural irregularities in the informant memo, denying bail.
Bail applications of both applicants rejected.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
Hon'ble Shri Justice Sharad Kumar Gupta Order On Board
06.12.2019
2
3
the same.
4
bail to the accused, this Court is not inclined to give the benefit of Section 439 CrPC to the applicants.
Sd/-
Sd/-
(Sharad Kumar Gupta) Judge
Parul
1 issue framed by the court
Whether bail should be granted to the applicants charges under Section 20-B of N.D.P.S. Act despite lodged seizure witnesses turned hostile in the trial Court.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Najim Ansari
Mo. Najrullah
State Of Chhattisgarh
Sharad Kumar Gupta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
