Allowed

Ravindra Singh v. State of Chhattisgarh

Chhattisgarh HC20 Nov 2019MCRC/6941/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Chhattisgarh granted regular bail to the applicant under Section 439 CrPC for illicit liquor possession. Although he exceeded the 5-liter limit, the court considered his custody duration and allegation of false implication as fitting circumstances for bail.

What did the court decide?

Release on regular bail via personal bond of Rs. 50,000 with one surety, subject to conditions not committing excise offences and cooperating with prosecution.

Ravindra Singh Vs State of Chhattisgarh — Cheque Dishonour | Chhattisgarh HC (2019)

¶1

¶2

NAFR

¶3

HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR

¶4

M.Cr.C. No. 6941 of 2019

¶5

Ravindra Singh S/o Late Kishore Singh Chauhan, Aged About 37 Years R/o Navapara, Police Station Dehat, Tehsil Ambikapur, District - Sarguja Chhattisgarh.

¶6

---- Applicant

¶7

Versus

¶8

State Of Chhattisgarh Through Station House Officer, Excise Police Station, District - Sarguja Chhattisgarh.

¶9

---- Respondent

¶10

For Applicant : Mr. Gopal Swaroop Gupta, Advocate. For Respondent : Mr. Vinod Kumar Tekam P.L.

¶11

Hon'ble Smt. Justice Rajani Dubey Order on Board

¶12

20/11/2019

¶13

The accused/applicant has moved this first bail application under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure for releasing him on regular bail during trial in connection with Crime No. 96/2019 registered at Police Station – Excise Police Station Abmikapur, District Sarguja (C.G.) for the offence punishable under Sections 34 (1-a), 34 (2), 36, 59(A) of the C.G. Excise Act.

¶14

It is the case of the prosecution that, 16.02 bulk liters of illicit liquor was seized by the police from the custody of applicant and thereby committed the offence.

¶15

Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant has been falsely implicated in the crime in question. He further submits that as the applicant is in custody since 28.09.2019 and the trial is likely to take some time for its

¶16

¶17

final disposal, he may be released on bail.

¶18

On the other hand, counsel for the State opposes the bail application.

¶19

• Taking into consideration the condition incorporated in Section 59-A(ii) of the C.G. Excise Act, 1915, and bearing in mind the principles of law laid down in Banti Singh v. State of Chhattisgarh (M.Cr.C. No.6846 of 2014), decided on 05.01.2015), if the facts of present case are examined, it is apparent that only 16.02 bulk liters of illicit liquor has been seized from him which is more than prescribed limit of 5 bulk liters, but looking to the fact that the applicant is in custody since 28.09.2019, trial is likely to take some more time and further taking into account the nature and gravity of offence and plea raised by the applicant that he has falsely been implicated in case, I am of the opinion that present is the fit case, in which, the applicant should be enlarged on regular bail.

¶20

Accordingly, the application is allowed. It is directed that on furnishing a personal bond in the sum of Rs. 50,000/- with one surety in the like sum to the satisfaction of the concerned Court for his appearance as and when directed, the applicant shall be released on bail, subject to following conditions:

¶21

That, the applicant shall furnish a specific, undertaking that while on bail, he will not commit any excise offence, otherwise bail granted to him shall be liable to be cancelled and shall co-operate the prosecution during trial.

¶22

That, the accused/applicant shall make himself

¶23

¶24

available for interrogation before the concerned Investigating OfÏcer as and when required and the accused/applicant shall not, directly or indirectly, make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him/her from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police ofÏcer.

¶25

That, the accused/applicant shall not act, in any manner, which will be prejudicial to fair and expeditious trial.

¶26

Certified copy, as per rules.

¶27

Sd/(Rajani Dubey) Judge

¶28

Vijay Sahu

Ravindra Singh v. State of Chhattisgarh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ravindra Singh v. State of Chhattisgarh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Satish Sablok Vs State of Chhattisgarh

Monesh Waditwar Vs T.Ishwar Rao and Anr.

Sumit Pandey Vs State of Chhattisgarh

S. Rudra Murty Vs Union of India

Johan Patel Vs State of Chhattisgarh

Vijay Sahare Vs State of Chhattisgarh