Bail application dismissed for want of prosecution as the applicant failed to appear for hearing in multiple rounds without representation.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
M.Cr.C. No.691 of 2019
Kuldeep Sahu, aged about 29 years, S/o Deenmani Sahu, R/o Village Sarwani, Police Station Baradwar, District Janjgir Champa (CG).
---- Applicant
Versus
State Of Chhattisgarh, through Police Station Baradwar, District Janjgir Champa (CG).
----Non-applicant
For Applicant : None present. For State : Mr. Vinod Tekam, Panel Lawyer
Hon'ble Shri Justice Sharad Kumar Gupta Order On Board
03/05/2019
(1) When the matter was called for hearing from Monday to Friday, none present for the applicant in both the rounds. No representation is made.
(2) In these circumstances, this Court has left with no other option but to dismiss the bail application for want of prosecution.
(3) Accordingly, the bail application is dismissed for want of prosecution.
Sd/- (Sharad Kumar Gupta) Judge
L/-
Kuldeep Sahu
Sharad Kumar Gupta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
