Bail application dismissed for want of prosecution due to the applicant's absence from hearing after two rounds of calling.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
M.Cr.C. No.688 of 2019
Vicky Manikpuri, S/o late Shri Mukundas Manikpuri, aged about 23 years, R/o Near Government Primary School, Kailash Nagar, Durg, Police Station Mohan Nagar, District Durg (CG).
---- Applicant
Versus
State of Chhattisgarh, through District Magistrate, District Durg (CG). ----Non-applicant
For Applicant : None present. For State : Mr. S.R.J. Jaiswal, Panel Lawyer
Hon'ble Shri Justice Sharad Kumar Gupta Order On Board
15/02/2019
(1) When the matter is called for hearing, none present for the applicant in both the rounds. No representation is made.
(2) In these circumstances, this Court has left with no other option but to dismiss the bail application for want of prosecution.
(3) Accordingly, the bail application is dismissed for want of prosecution.
Sd/- (Sharad Kumar Gupta) Judge
L/-
Vicky Manikpuri
State of Chhattisgarh
Sharad Kumar Gupta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
