This High Court dismissed the first bail application filed under Section 439 CrPC for an accused charged with possession of 50.490 Kg of cannabis. The Court held that the huge quantity of seized goods precluded granting bail benefits.
Bail application dismissed; applicant not inclined to be released on bail.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
MCRC No. 611 of 2019
Sanjay Kumar Tripathi S/o Birendra Kumar Tripathi Aged About 38 Years Caste Brahman ,r/o Urai Police Station Kotwali District Jaloun Uttar Pradesh ., District : Jalaun, Uttar Pradesh.
---- Applicant
Versus
State Of Chhattisgrh Through Station House Officer ,police Station Keshkal ,district Kondagaon Chhattisgarh., District : Kondagaon, Chhattisgarh.
---- Respondent
For the Applicant : Shri N.K. Chaterjee, Advocate For the State : Shri Wasim Miyan, Panel Lawyer
Hon'ble Shri Justice Sharad Kumar Gupta
Order On Board
13/02/2019
Sd/-
(Sharad Kumar Gupta) Judge
Kamde
2 issues framed by the court
Whether bail should be granted to the applicant accused of possessing a huge quantity of cannabis under the NDPS Act.
Whether the circumstances justify the release of the applicant on bail under Section 439 CrPC.
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Sanjay Kumar Tripathi
State Of Chhattisgrh
Sharad Kumar Gupta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
