The High Court of Chhattisgarh, Bilaspur, dismissed a bail application for want of prosecution after the applicants failed to appear for hearing in two consecutive rounds and made no representation.
Bail application dismissed for want of prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
M.Cr.C. No.583 of 2019
---- Applicants
Versus
State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Police Station Farasgaon District Kondagaon Chhattisgarh. ----Non-applicant
For Applicant : None present. For State : Mr. S.R.J. Jaiswal, Panel Lawyer
Hon'ble Shri Justice Sharad Kumar Gupta Order On Board
14/02/2019
(1) When the matter is called for hearing, none present for the applicants in both the rounds. No representation is made.
(2) In these circumstances, this Court has left with no other option but to dismiss the bail application for want of prosecution.
(3) Accordingly, the bail application is dismissed for want of prosecution.
Sd/- (Sharad Kumar Gupta) Judge
L/-
1 issue framed by the court
Whether to allow or dismiss the bail application in the absence of the applicants.
Vaibhav Banura Konde
Pawan Solanki
Vinod Solanki
Mohd. Firoj
State Of Chhattisgarh
Sharad Kumar Gupta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
