The High Court rejected an anticipatory bail application filed by the applicant in a narcotics case. The court held that the applicant's presence near a vehicle containing seized cannabis made him ineligible for bail under Section 439 Cr.P.C.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
MCRC No. 4460 of 2019
Mohit Jatav, aged about 26 years, S/o Budhram Jatav, R/o Johanapur, P.S. Fatehpur, Delhi.
---- Applicant
Versus
State of Chhattisgarh, through Station House Officer, Police Station Devbhog, District Gariyaband (CG).
---- Non-applicant
For Applicant : Mr. Atanu Ghosh, Advocate For Non-applicant : Mr. H.S. Ahluwalia, Deputy Advocate General
Hon'ble Shri Justice Sharad Kumar Gupta Order On Board
14.08.2019
2
Sd/-
(Sharad Kumar Gupta) JUDGE
L/-
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the applicant is entitled to bail in a case involving possession of a vehicle with seized cannabis under the NDPS Act.
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Mohit Jatav
State of Chhattisgarh
Sharad Kumar Gupta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
