Three bail applications under Section 439 CrPC arising from a common crime regarding seizure of country-made liquor were heard. The court rejected bail for one applicant due to criminal antecedents and for the others due to the huge quantity of liquor seized.
Bail applications of all three applicants rejected; accused remanded to custody.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
MCRC No. 31 of 2019
---- Applicants
Versus
State Of Chhattisgarh Through District Magistrate Rajnandgaon, Chhattisgarh., District : Rajnandgaon, Chhattisgarh.
---- Respondent
Along with
MCRC No. 803 of 2019
Malleshyam Bandivar S/o Rajjiya Bandivar Aged About 47 Years R/o Village Palebhatti, P.S. Anudhi, Distt Rajnandgaon Chhattisgarh, District : Rajnandgaon, Chhattisgarh.
---- Applicant
Versus
State Of Chhattisgarh Through District Magistrate Rajnandgaon Chhattisgarh, District : Rajnandgaon, Chhattisgarh.
---- Respondent
For the Applicants : Shri PKC Tiwari, Sr. Advocate with Ashutosh Trivedi, Advocate For the State : Ms. Sangeeta Mishra, Govt. Adv.
Hon'ble Shri Justice Sharad Kumar Gupta
Order On Board
01/02/2019
2
Sd/- (Sharad Kumar Gupta) Judge
Kamde
2 issues framed by the court
Whether to grant bail to applicants charged with Country Liquor smuggling under Sections 34(2) of C.G. Excise Act
Whether presence of criminal antecedents and quantity of seized liquor justify rejection of bail applications
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Krishna Bandivar
Budhram Potavi
Malleshyam Bandivar
State Of Chhattisgarh
Sharad Kumar Gupta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
