Allowed

Sumit @ Bandar Sisodiya v. State of Chhattisgarh

Chhattisgarh HC10 May 2019MCRC/2825/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Applicant filed a second bail application under Section 439 Cr.P.C. in a theft case. Court allowed bail subject to furnishing two sureties and a personal bond with a condition to avoid similar offences.

What did the court decide?

Application allowed; release on bail with two sureties of Rs. 25,000 each and one personal bond of Rs. 50,000 on condition not to commit similar offence.

Sumit @ Bandar Sisodiya Vs State of Chhattisgarh — Bail and Remand | Chhattisgarh HC (2019)

¶1

¶2

NAFR

¶3

HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR MCRC No. 2825 of 2019

¶4

Sumit @ Bandar Sisodiya S/o Radheshyam Sisodiya Aged About 22 Years R/o Mirganj, Allahabad (Uttar Pradesh) Present R/o Bholgarh, Police Station And District Anuppur Madhya Pradesh.

¶5

---- Applicant

¶6

Versus

¶7

State of Chhattisgarh Through Station House Officer, Police Station Marwahi, District Bilaspur CG

¶8

---- Respondent

¶9

For applicant Mr. Yogendra Chaturvedi, Adv. For non-applicant/State Mrs. M. Asha, PL.

¶10

Hon'ble Shri Justice Sharad Kumar Gupta Order On Board

¶11

10-5-2019

¶12

This is second bail application under Section 439 of Cr.P.C. preferred by the applicant. His first bail application being MCRC No. 1943/2019 was dismissed by this Court for want of prosecution vide order dated 5-4-2019.

¶13

The applicant has been arrested in connection with Crime No. 110/2018 registered in police station Marwahi, Distt. Bilaspur (CG) for offence punishable under Sections 379, 34 of IPC.

¶14

Perused the case diary.

¶15

Prosecution story in brief is that on 10-8-2018 near Jafar Boot House, Marwahi, some unknown person stole Rs. 30,000/- and coins of Rs. 1,500/- from the dickey of motorcycle of complainant Govind Gupta. On the memorandum of applicant, Rs. 1,000/have been seized from him.

¶16

Counsel for the applicant argued that the applicant is innocent and has been falsely implicated hence he be released on bail.

¶17

On the other hand, the State Counsel opposed the bail application. He further submits that two cases of similar type have been registered against him.

¶18

Looking to the above facts and circumstances of the case, as the trial will take its own time, application is allowed. It is ordered that if the applicant furnishes two solvent sureties each for a sum of Rs. 25,000/- along with one personal bond of Rs. 50,000/- to the satisfaction of the trial Court concerned with the condition that he will not involve himself in similar type of offence, he be released on bail.

¶19

CC as per rules.

¶20

Sd/(Sharad Kumar Gupta) Judge

¶21

Pathak

Sumit @ Bandar Sisodiya v. State of Chhattisgarh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sumit @ Bandar Sisodiya v. State of Chhattisgarh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Ashutosh Bhattacharya Vs State of Chhattisgarh

Baisakhu Dhruv & Anr. Vs State of Chhattisgarh

Shivam Goswami Vs State of Chhattisgarh

Ishwar Yadaw Vs State of Chhattisgarh

Beeresh Yadav Vs State of Chhattisgarh

Pawan @ Pintu Banjara Vs State of Chhattisgarh