Allowed

Dharam Rajwade v. State of Chhattisgarh

Chhattisgarh HC6 Feb 2019MCRC/237/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

High Court of Chhattisgarh disposed of a bail application under Section 439 CrPC in a rape case. Court held that likelihood of absconding or tampering was low and granted bail upon furnishing one solvent surety and a personal bond with specific conditions.

What did the court decide?

Released on bail upon furnishing one solvent surety for Rs. 25,000 and executing a personal bond for like sum with conditions to appear at trial court.

Dharam Rajwade Vs State of Chhattisgarh — Bail and Remand | Chhattisgarh HC (2019)

¶1

¶2

NAFR

¶3

HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR

¶4

MCRC No. 237 of 2019

¶5

Dharam Rajwade S/o Sonsai Rajwade Aged About 32 Years CasteRajwar, Occupation- Agriculture, R/o Village- Jarhi, Police StationBhatgaon, District- Surajpur, Chhattisgarh., District : Surajpur, Chhattisgarh. ---- Applicant Versus State Of Chhattisgarh Through Station House Officer, Police StationBhatgaon, District- Surajpur, Chhattisgarh., District : Surajpur, Chhattisgarh. ---- Respondent For the Applicant : Shri Nishikant Sinha, Advocate For the State : Shri Wasim Miyan, Panel Lawyer For the Objector : Ms. Sunita Sahu, Advocate -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

¶6

Hon'ble Shri Justice Sharad Kumar Gupta

¶7

Order On Board

¶8

06/02/2019

¶9

Heard on I.A. No. 1/2019.

¶10

Looking to the facts and circumstances of the case, counsel for the prosecutrix is permitted to assist the State counsel.

¶11

I.A. No. 1/2019 is disposed of accordingly.

¶12

This is the first bail application under Section 439 of the CrPC and there is no bail application is pending before any other Court.

¶13

Perused the case diary provided by the learned counsel for the State in connection with the Crime No.170/2018 registered at Police Station Bhatgaon, District Surajpur (C.G.) for the offence punishable under Section 376 of IPC.

¶14

Case of the prosecution, in brief is that the prosecutrix is about 20 years old. She is resident of village Bhatgaon. One year prior onwards applicant had committed repeatedly sexual intercourse with prosecutrix on pretext of the marriage. She became pregnant. Applicant refused to marry with her. He had also refused to accept her and newly born baby.

¶15

Learned counsel for the applicant submits that he is innocent and falsely implicated in the present case, therefore, he shall be released on bail.

¶16

On the other hand, counsel for the State opposes the bail application. He further submits that no criminal antecedents against the applicant.

¶17

Looking to the facts and circumstances of the case,looking to the fact that there is no likelihood of the accused to abscond and tamper the

¶18

¶19

evidence, it is directed that if the applicant furnishes one solvent surety for a sum of Rs. 25,000/- along with a personal bond in the like sum to the satisfaction of the concerned Court with the condition that he shall appear before the trial Court at 11.00 am as and when directed till trial and he would cooperate during the trial, he shall be released on bail.

¶20

Certified copy as per rules.

¶21

Sd/- (Sharad Kumar Gupta) Judge

¶22

Kamde

Dharam Rajwade v. State of Chhattisgarh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Dharam Rajwade v. State of Chhattisgarh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Naveen Kumar Yadav Vs the State of Madhya Pradesh

Virendra Kujur Vs State of Chhattisgarh

Parmeshwar Sahu & Ors. Vs State of Chhattisgarh

Umar Imam Vs the State of Chhattisgarh

Wanmali Tandi Vs State of Chhattisgarh

Tarachand Sahu Vs State of Chhattisgarh