In a first bail application under Section 439 Cr.P.C., the High Court of Chhattisgarh, Bilaspur, refused bail to the applicant for offences under the IPC and POCSO Act involving a minor prosecutrix, holding the outcry against fulfilling the grandmother. City was not inclined to grant bail.
MCRC dismissed; applicant not granted bail.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
MCRC No. 2005 of 2019
---- Applicant
Versus
---- Respondent
For applicant Mr. Kunal Das, Adv. on behalf of Mr. Jitendra Shrivastava, Adv.
For Respondent/State Mr. Wasim Miyan, PL
Hon'ble Shri Justice Sharad Kumar Gupta Order On Board
14-5-2019
Sd/(Sharad Kumar Gupta) Judge
pathak
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the applicant is entitled to bail under Section 439 Cr.P.C. in a case involving offences under the POCSO Act.
Whether the age of the prosecutrix and societal impact preclude the granting of bail.
5 provisions across 3 enactments
Raju @ Nanhu Korva
State Of Chhattisgarh
Sharad Kumar Gupta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
