Allowed

Abhish Swami v. State Economic Offences Investigation Bureau

Chhattisgarh HC12 Apr 2019MCRC/1267/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In this fourth bail application, the High Court of Chhattisgarh allowed the petitioner's plea for release under Section 436-A of the Cr.P.C., citing the fact that he had served more than half the maximum sentence and a co-accused in similar charges had already been released.

What did the court decide?

The petitioners released on bail by executing a personal bond for Rs. 25,000 and one surety bond for the like amount.

Abhish Swami Vs State Economic Offences Investigation Bureau — Corruption | Chhattisgarh HC (2019)

¶1

¶2

MCRC No. 1267 of 2019

¶3

NAFR

¶4

HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR

¶5

MCRC No. 1267 of 2019

¶6

Abhish Swami S/o Krishnanand Swami Aged About 46 Years R/o B-F-1 Archana Vihar, Nehru Nagar, Road Bilaspur Chhattisgarh Permanent R/o Awas Yojana Colony, Camp And P. S. Umaria District Umaria M. P.

¶7

---- Petitioner

¶8

Versus

¶9

State Economic Offences Investigation Bureau Raipur District Raipur Chhattisgarh.

¶10

---- Respondent

¶11

For Petitioner :- Shri Shashank Thakur, Advocate For Respondent-State :- Shri R.S. Baghel, Dy. A.G.

¶12

Order On Board

¶13

¶14

Shri Prashant Kumar Mishra, Ag. C.J.

¶15

12/04/2019

¶16

This is fourth bail application by the applicant Abhish Swami under Section 439 Cr. P.C. as he has been arrested on

¶17

¶18

MCRC No. 1267 of 2019

¶19

05.04.2015 on the allegation of commission of offence under Sections 109, 420, 467, 468, 471, 120B of Indian Penal Code and Sections 13(1)(e), 13(2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 under Crime No.05/2015 registered at ACB/EOW, Raipur (C.G.).

¶20

The first bail application MCRC No.4875/2015 was rejected on merits. Similarly, the second bail application bearing MCRC No.2934/2016 and the third bail application bearing MCRC No.3584/2017 were dismissed for the reason that there was no change in circumstance.

¶21

In this fourth application learned counsel for the applicant would contend that the applicant is in jail since 05.04.2015. Initially charge-sheet was filed against the accused persons for offences under Sections 13(1)(e) and 13(2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 and under Sections 109, 120B, 420, 467, 468 and 471 of the I.P.C. however, while framing charges against accused persons on 07.10.2016, the trial Court has framed charges against the present applicant for offences under Section 12 of the Prevention of Corruption Act and under Sections 109 and 120B of the I.P.C. These provisions carry the maximum sentence of imprisonment upto seven years. It is contended that under Section 436-A of the Cr.P.C., the applicant having undergone more than half of the maximum jail sentence, he

¶22

¶23

MCRC No. 1267 of 2019

¶24

is entitled for bail. Reliance is placed on the judgment rendered by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the matter of Pawan Kumar Agrawal vs. State of Chhattisgarh, (2015) 13 SCC 605 (Bhim Singh vs. Union of India), (2016) 3 SCC 700 (Inhuman Condition in 1382 Prisons, in re) and (2017) 5 SCC 702 (Hussain vs. Union of India).

¶25

Learned counsel for the applicant would submit that exactly similarly placed co accused Pawan Kumar Agrawal has been enlarged on bail by this Court in Criminal Revision No.1352/2018 decided on 31.01.2019 by invoking the provision under Section 436-A of Cr.P.C.

¶26

Learned State counsel would oppose the bail application on submission that the offences allegedly committed by the applicant being serious in nature, he is not entitled to be enlarged on bail.

¶27

Having heard learned counsel for the parties and for the reason that the applicant is in jail for more than 4 years and co-accused Pawan Kumar Agrawal facing similar charges has already been released on bail by invoking Section 436-A of Cr.P.C., I am inclined to release him on bail. Accordingly, the application is allowed and the applicant is directed to be released on bail on his executing a personal bond for a sum

¶28

¶29

MCRC No. 1267 of 2019

¶30

of Rs.25,000/- with one surety for the like amount to the satisfaction of the trial Court. He is directed to appear before the trial Court on each an every date given by the said Court.

¶31

Sd/(Prashant Kumar Mishra) Acting Chief Justice

¶32

Ankit

Abhish Swami v. State Economic Offences Investigation Bureau

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Abhish Swami v. State Economic Offences Investigation Bureau

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Kiranpal Singh Chowla Vs Guru Ghasidas University

Poonam Mishra Vs State of Chhattisgarh

Shashikala Agrawal Vs State Of Chhattisgarh and Ors.

Ku. Dashoda @ Yashoda Vs State of Chhattisgarh

Manoj Chaturvedi Vs State of Chhattisgarh

Budlu Singh Vs Smt. Shammi Abidi