The High Court of Chhattisgarh allowed a Motion for Case Controvert (MCC) restoring a writ petition that was previously dismissed for want of prosecution due to the bona fide absence of counsel.
MCC No. 52 of 2018 allowed; Writ Petition No. 4205 of 2005 restored.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
MCC No. 52 of 2018
---Applicants
Versus
---- Respondents
For Applicants : Mr. Surendra Kumar Dewangan, Advocate For State/Respondent No. 1 : Mr. Rahul Mishra, Dy. G.A.
Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal Order on Board
01/04/2019
Sd/(Sanjay K. Agrawal) Judge
Harneet
1 issue framed by the court
Whether to allow the petition for restoration of Writ Petition No. 4205 of 2005 after it was dismissed for want of prosecution.
Smt. Nirmala Singha Rajput
Shri Abhishek Singh Rajput
Ku. Priya Rajput
State of Madhya Pradesh
Divisional Deputy Commissioner, Sales Tax, Raipur
Commissioner, Sales Tax Madhya Pradesh, Indore
Sanjay K. Agrawal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
