The Acting Chief Justice dismissed the motion concerning the restoration of a writ petition. The court held that depositing court costs after a delay of four years, beyond the reasonable period of three months, is not permissible.
Motion for restoration of WPCR No.172/2014 dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1 MCC No. 360 of 2019
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
MCC No. 360 of 2019
---- Appellants
Versus
---- Respondents
2 MCC No. 360 of 2019
For Appellants :- Office Reference
Order On Board
By
Hon'ble Shri Prashant Kumar Mishra, Ag. CJ
03/05/2019
Sd/(Prashant Kumar Mishra) Acting Chief Justice
Ankit
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the deposit of court costs after an excessive delay of approximately four years is permissible.
Kant Agrawal and others
State Of Chhattisgarh and others
Prashant Kumar Mishra
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
