The Single Bench of the High Court of Chhattisgarh dismissed an appeal under Section 30 of the Employee's Compensation Act, 1923 for failing to comply with mandatory provisions despite sufficient opportunities.
The appeal is dismissed at this stage.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
MAC No. 294 of 2019
Smt. Jaishree Verma W/o Khilawan Verma Aged About 40 Years R/o Kewatpara, Near Saraswati Gyan Mandir School, Kewatpara Ward No.10, Chikli District - Rajnandgaon Chhattisgarh. ---(Owner Of The House).
---- Appeal
Versus
---- Respondents
For Appellant:
Shri Aditya Bhardwaj, Advocate.
Single Bench:Hon'ble Shri Sanjay Agrawal, J Order On Board
18.07.2019
2
despite sufficient opportunity being given by this Court as evidenced by order sheets dated 06.02.2019 and 26.06.2019.
Sd/-
(Sanjay Agrawal) JUDGE
vivek
1 issue framed by the court
Whether a Misc. Appeal under Section 30 of the Employee's Compensation Act, 1923 is entertainable when mandatory provisions of the third proviso to sub-section (1) of the said section are not complied
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Smt. Jaishree Verma
Ramkumar Sahu
Smt. Pemin Bai Sahu
Sanjay Agrawal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
