not to enter into such transaction with his patient, who was in need of money for his own treatment at the hands of the appellant. The legal niceties apart, in a suit for specific performance which by itself is an equitable relief, mere readiness and willingness would not be sole determining factor to issue a decree. In such matters Court's judicial conscience should at once reach to a conclusion as to whether it is a fit case for grant of specific performance. Once the trial Court which has the benefit of seeing the witnesses and their demeanour including the ignorance, illiteracy or innocence of the parties, reaches to the conclusion that it is not a fit case for grant of decree of specific performance, the appellate Court should not interfere with the exercise of judicial discretion which is based on facts available on record. The appeal against exercise of judicial discretion is an appeal on principle, therefore, it should not be interfered ordinarily, as has been observed by the Supreme Court in the matter of Wander Ltd. And Another Vs. Antox India P. Ltd {1990 (Supp) SCC 727} in para-14 which reads thus:-
