Criminal revision allowing condonation of delay. The Bench found no evidence of poison administration despite victim and doctor testimony. Held that acquittal giving benefit of doubt was not legally flawed. Petition dismissed.
Application for condonation of delay allowed. Petition dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
CRMP No. 911 of 2019
Versus
---- Respondents
For Petitioner/State : Mr. Anand Verma, Dy. G. A.
DB : Hon'ble Shri Justice Manindra Mohan Shrivastava
Hon'ble Smt. Justice Rajani Dubey
Order On Board
20/06/2019
Sd/Sd/-
(Manindra Mohan Shrivastava) (Rajani Dubey) Judge Judge
Ravi
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the acquittal of respondents ignoring victim and doctor testimony regarding poisoning claims suffers from patent illegality necessitating interference.
Whether the trial court acquittal gives wrong benefit of doubt.
The State Of Chhattisgarh Through District Magistrate District Kabirdham
Rakesh Pandey
Ramavatar
Manindra Mohan Shrivastava
Rajani Dubey
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
