State of Chhattisgarh sought leave to appeal against an acquittal in a rape case. The Bench observed that evidence suggested a consensual relationship with a dispute-led FIR. No grounds for interference were found; leave to appeal was rejected and the appeal dismissed.
Leave to appeal rejected; petition dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
CRMP No. 892 of 2019
---- Petitioner
Versus
--- Respondent
For Petitioner/State : Mr. Suryakant Mishra, Panel Lawyer.
DB : Hon'ble Shri Justice Manindra Mohan Shrivastava
Hon'ble Smt. Justice Rajani Dubey
Order On Board
19/06/2019
Sd/Sd/(Manindra Mohan Shrivastava) (Rajani Dubey) Judge Judge
Ravi
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the prosecutrix's statement indicates rape or merely a consensual relationship resulting in the filing of an FIR.
Whether there is any ground for granting leave to appeal under Section 379 of CrPC against the acquittal in a rape case.
State Of Chhattisgarh
Ramjay S/o Sonaram Jagat
Manindra Mohan Shrivastava
Rajani Dubey
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
