The High Court allowed an application to condone a delay of 199 days in filing a leave to appeal. It dismissed the appellant's appeal against the trial Court's acquittal of the accused in a case involving IPC and POCSO charges, finding no cogent evidence of the prosecutrix's age.
I.A. No.1 allowed to condone 199 days delay; Cr.M.P. dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
CRMP No. 640 of 2019
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
CRMP No. 640 of 2019
---- Appellant
Versus
---- Respondent
For Appellant-State
:- Shri Neeraj Mehta, PL
Hon'ble Shri Prashant Kumar Mishra
Hon'ble Shri Gautam Chourdiya, JJ. Order on Board
By
Prashant Kumar Mishra, J
09/07/2019
I.A. No.1 of 2019
2
CRMP No. 640 of 2019
3
CRMP No. 640 of 2019
Sd/Sd/(Prashant Kumar Mishra) (Gautam Chourdiya) Judge Judge
Ankit
2 issues framed by the court
Whether delay of 199 days in filing application for leave to appeal should be condoned.
Whether the trial court correctly acquitted the accused for lack of evidence regarding the age of the prosecutrix.
State of Chhattisgarh
Naresh Beck
Prashant Kumar Mishra
Gautam Chourdiya
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
