The Benches allowed the delay in filing the Criminal Revision, noting the consistent acquittal of the respondent due to stark contradictions in testimonies. However, the High Court dismissed the revision, holding it was not a fit case for leave to appeal.
Criminal Revision Petition No. 2072 of 2019 dismissed as not a fit case for leave to appeal.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
CRMP No. 2072 of 2019
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
CRMP No. 2072 of 2019
---- Applicant
Versus
---- Respondent
For Applicant-State
:- Shri Avinash Choubey, PL
Hon'ble Shri Prashant Kumar Mishra Hon'ble Shri Gautam Chourdiya, JJ.
Order on Board By
Prashant Kumar Mishra, J
16/09/2019
2
CRMP No. 2072 of 2019
aged about 23 years. As per the prosecution case the prosecutrix was alone in her house at the time of incident. Her mother had gone for her own treatment to Janjgir, whereas her father, examined as PW-2, Mukhuram Patel, had gone towards village Basti. When father returned to home he witnessed that accused is running away from his house. On inquiry from the prosecutrix she disclosed to her father that the accused outraged her modesty by touching her breast and made aggravated sexual assault by inserting his penis into her mouth.
3
CRMP No. 2072 of 2019
Sd/Sd/(Prashant Kumar Mishra) (Gautam Chourdiya) Judge Judge
Ankit
3 issues framed by the court
Whether the one month delay in filing the Cr.M.P. is condonable.
Whether the trial court was justified in acquitting the accused due to inconsistencies in prosecution evidence.
Whether the special leave for appeal should be granted in this case.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
State of Chhattisgarh Through Its Station House Officer, Police Station Sakti
Arun Patel
Prashant Kumar Mishra
Gautam Chourdiya
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
