Dismissed

The State of Chhattisgarh, v. Kishunlal Khairwar

Chhattisgarh HC25 Sept 2019CRMP/1943/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Chhattisgarh, Bilaspur, disposed of a Cr.M.P. seeking supervision of a criminal acquittal. The court condoned a 473-day delay but held there was no ground to grant leave to appeal against the acquittal on charges of Section 306 IPC, as it was correctly based on material.

What did the court decide?

Leave to appeal was not granted, and the Cr.M.P. was dismissed at the admission stage.

The State of Chhattisgarh, Vs… — Constitutional and Fundamental Rights | Chhattisgarh HC (2019)

¶1

NAFR

¶2

HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR

¶3

Cr.M.P. No.1943 of 2019

¶4

The State of Chhattisgarh through District Magistrate, Janjgir-Champa, Chhattisgarh

¶5

---- Petitioner

¶6

versus

¶7

Kishunlal Khairwar, son of Fulsingh, aged about 26 years, resident of Village Mahuda, Police Station Balouda, District Janjgir-Champa, Chhattisgarh

¶8

--- Respondent

¶9

For Petitioner	: Shri Anand Verma, Dy. Government Advocate
For Respondent	: None

¶10

Hon'ble Shri Justice Arvind Singh Chandel

¶11

Order on Board

¶12

25.9.2019

¶13

1. Heard on I.A. No.1 for condonation of delay in filing the instant application (Cr.M.P.). For the reasons stated in I.A. No.1, it is allowed and delay of 473 days is condoned.

¶14

2. Also heard on admission. Perused the material available.

¶15

3. Vide impugned judgment dated 19.1.2018 passed by the Additional Sessions Judge (FTC), Janjgir, District Janjgir-Champa in Sessions Trial No.105 of 2016, the Respondent has been acquitted of the charge framed under Section 306 of the Indian Penal Code.

¶16

4. Deceased Laxminbai was wife of the present Respondent. Allegedly, she committed suicide on 2.6.2016 on being instigated by the Respondent. Kishunlal (PW1), Fulsingh (PW2), Rakesh Nirmalkar (PW3) have not supported the case of the prosecution and turned hostile. Ramkumar Khairwar (PW6) is brother of the deceased. He has categorically admitted the fact that on disputes getting raised due to consumption of liquor by the Respondent and other domestic reasons, the Respondent used to beat the

¶17

¶18

deceased and as a result of which the deceased committed suicide. From the material available, it is not established that the Respondent ever instigated the deceased to commit suicide. I find that the Respondent has rightly been acquitted by the Trial Court.

¶19

5. I find no ground to grant leave to appeal. The application (Cr.M.P.) is, therefore, dismissed at the admission stage itself.

¶20

Sd/( Arvind Singh Chandel ) Judge

¶21

Gopal

The State of Chhattisgarh, v. Kishunlal Khairwar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

The State of Chhattisgarh, v. Kishunlal Khairwar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Karan Singh Dhuri Vs State of Chhattisgarh

Riyasat Ali Vs State of Chhattisgarh

Manohar Lal Ghritlahre Vs State of Chhattisgarh

Bhagat Ram Sidar Vs State Of Chhattisgarh

State of Chhattisgarh Vs Sitaram Sahu

Shatrughan Nishad & Anr. Vs State of Chhattisgarh