High Court of Chhattisgarh dismissed an application for leave to appeal against an acquittal under Section 306 IPC, holding no interference required as the Trial Court correctly found no link between the respondent and the deceased's suicide.
Application for grant of leave to appeal is rejected; instant petition stands dismissed at motion stage.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
CRMP No. 1769 of 2019
---- Petitioner
Versus
---- Respondent
For petitioner/State : Mr. Raghavendra Verma, G.A.
Hon'ble Shri Justice Ram Prasanna Sharma
Order on Board
18-11-2019
2
(i) instigating a person to commit an offence
(ii) engaging in a conspiracy to commit an offence
(iii) intentionally aiding a person to commit an
offence
3
record, it is not a case where interference of this court is required in the judgement of the trial court. It is not a case where respondent should be called for full consideration of this petition.
Sd/-
(Ram Prasanna Sharma)
Judge
Raju
2 issues framed by the court
Whether leave to appeal under Section 378(3) CrPC should be granted against an acquittal on Section 306 IPC.
Whether the Trial Court's finding of no incitement or conspiracy to commit suicide warrants interference.
4 provisions across 2 enactments
State Of Chhattisgarh Through Station House Officer, Police Station Berla
Iliyas Khan S/o Gulbahar Khan
Ram Prasanna Sharma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
