Single Judge allowed condonation of delay in challenging acquittal. Held that as the petitioner is a family member of the victim, leave to appeal is not required under Section 372 CrPC, and the CRMP is allowed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
CRMP No. 1769 of 2018
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
CRMP No. 1769 of 2018
---- Petitioner
Versus
---- Respondent
For Petitioner
Ms. Usha Chandrakar, Advocate
DB: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Prashant Kumar Mishra & Hon'ble Mr. Justice Gautam Chourdiya
Order On Board by Prashant Kumar Mishra, J.
17/9/2019
IA No.1
CRMP No.1769 of 2018
2
CRMP No. 1769 of 2018
| Sd/- Sd/- |
|---|
| ( Prashant Kumar Mishra (Gautam Chourdiya) Judge Judge |
Shyna
1 issue framed by the court
Whether leave to appeal is required from the CRMP since the petitioner is a family member of the victim entitled to file under Section 372 of CrPC.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Abhishek Kumar Patel
Deepak Kumar Kashyap
Prashant Kumar Mishra
Gautam Chourdiya
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
