The court allowed condonation of delay for admitting the acquittal appeal and granted leave to appeal under Section 378 CrPC, issuing notice to the respondent for payment of court fees.
Condonation of delay of 54 days; Leave to appeal under Section 378(4) CrPC granted; Notice issued to respondent for PF.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
Order Sheet
CRMP No. 1572 of 2019
Aajuram Vs. Mikhail Kibiya @ Banty
| 4 | |
|---|---|
| 21.11.2019 | Mr. Sunil Verma, counsel for the petitioner. Heard on I.A. No. 01/2019, application for condonation of delay in filing the petition. On due consideration and for the reasons mentioned in the application, the same is allowed and delay of 54 days in filing the petition is condoned. Also heard on application for grant of leave to appeal filed under Section 378 (4) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973. On due consideration, application for grant of leave to appeal is allowed. Registry is directed to register the case as regular Acquittal Appeal. Admit. Issue notice to the respondent on payment of PF within two weeks. Notice be made returnable within six weeks. List the case for further orders in the month of February, 2020. |
Sd/- (Ram Prasanna Sharma) Judge |
Arun
3 issues framed by the court
Whether to condone the delay of 54 days in filing the petition?
Whether to grant leave to appeal under Section 378 (4) CrPC?
Whether to issue notice to the respondent on payment of court fees?
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Aajuram
Mikhail Kibiya @ Banty
Ram Prasanna Sharma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
