The High Court of Chhattisgarh condoned the 74-day delay in filing CRMP No. 1312 of 2019. The court declined to grant leave to appeal the trial court's acquittal, ruling the charges were an afterthought, and dismissed the petition.
Leave to appeal is not granted; the CRMP is dismissed following condonation of delay.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
CRMP No. 1312 of 2019
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
CRMP No. 1312 of 2019
---- Petitioner
Versus
---- Respondent
For Petitioner Mr. Neeraj Mehta, Panel Lawyer
DB: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Prashant Kumar Mishra &
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Gautam Chourdiya
Order On Board By
Prashant Kumar Mishra, J.
22/7/2019
2
CRMP No. 1312 of 2019
Sections 376, 313 of IPC and Section 3(2) (v) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989.
Sd/- Sd/-
( Prashant Kumar Mishra) (Gautam Chourdiya) Judge Judge
Shyna
2 issues framed by the court
Whether leave to file a Criminal Review Petition regarding the accused's acquittal in sexual offence and SC/ST atrocity charges should be granted.
Whether the delay of 74 days in filing the criminal review petition can be condoned.
State Of Chhattisgarh Through Station House OfÏcer, Police Station AJK Jagdalpur, District Bastar Chhattisgarh
Sukhlal @ Bhima S/o Padlu
Prashant Kumar Mishra
Gautam Chourdiya
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
