Ajay Sahu v. State of Chhattisgarh
Case brief
What is this about?
High Court held that the criminal appeal abated due to the death of the sole appellant, based on a report from the Special Judge.
High Court held that the criminal appeal abated due to the death of the sole appellant, based on a report from the Special Judge.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
CRA No. 829 of 2004
Ajay Sahu, S/o Laxman Sahu, aged about 24 years, R/o Saraibhadra, P.S. Kotwali, Raigarh, District: Raigarh (C.G.)
---- Appellant
Versus
The State of Chhattisgarh through D.M. Raigarh, District: Raigarh (C.G.)
---- Respondent
For Appellant : None. For Respondent/State : Mr. Alok Nigam, G.A.
Hon'ble Shri Justice Arvind Singh Chandel Order on Board
11/12/2019
1. Perused the P.U.D dated 25.11.2019 received from Special Judge, (Atrocities Act) Raigarh, District-Raigarh (C.G.) wherein, it has been reported that the sole Appellant has died on 07.08.2018, a death certificate in this regard is also annexed with the report.
2. Considering the above that the Appellant has died, therefore, this appeal is abated on behalf of the Appellant.
Sd/-
(Arvind Singh Chandel) Judge
Saurabh
Ajay Sahu
The State of Chhattisgarh through D.M. Raigarh
Arvind Singh Chandel
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court