Raj Lal v. State
Case brief
What is this about?
High Court allowed appeal in part, acquitting appellant of Section 307 IPC charges due to injury extent but convicting under Section 324 IPC, sentencing to time already undergone.
What did the court decide?
Appellant acquitted of Section 307 IPC charge but held guilty under Section 324 IPC and sentenced to the period already undergone.
What the court decided
1
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
CRA No. 673 of 2001
- Raj Lal, Son of Shri Singarsai Gond, Resident of village Bhadi, Police Station Baikunthpur, District Koriya, Chhattisgarh
---Appellant
Versus
- The State of Chhattisgarh, Thorugh Police Station Baikunthpur, District Koriya, Chhattisgarh.
---- Respondent
| For Appellant | Shri V.K. Sahu, Advocate. |
|---|---|
| For Respondent/State | Shri Santosh Bharat, P.L. |
Hon'ble Shri Justice Gautam Chourdiya Judgment on Board
Issues for consideration
3 issues framed by the court
Whether the appellant should be acquitted of the charge under Section 307 IPC for attempted murder.
Whether the appellant is liable for conviction under Section 324 IPC for voluntarily causing hurt by fire.
Whether the appellant should be sentenced beyond the period already undergone in custody.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Raj Lal
- respondent
The State of Chhattisgarh
Coram
Gautam Chourdiya
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Chhattisgarh HC
- Decided on
- · August
- Registered
- Case no.
- CRA/673/2001
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court