Appeal against conviction under IPC Sections 452, 307 and 324 for house trespass, attempt to murder, and assault. High Court held the trial court correctly convicted the appellant and dismissed the appeal finding the evidence reliable.
The appeal was dismissed inasmuch as the trial court committed no error in convicting and sentencing the appellant.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
CRA No. 268 of 2013
Versus
--- Respondent
For Appellant : Shri D.K. Vishwakarma, Advocate. For Respondent/State: Shri Lav Sharma, Panel Lawyer.
Hon'ble Shri Justice Rajendra Chandra Singh Samant Judgment on Board
07/02/2019
2
also assaulted Jagannath (PW-4) in the same incident. During investigation Sukariyabai (PW-2) and Jagannath (PW-4) were medically examined. The injuries caused to Sukariyabai (PW-2) were found to be grievous in nature, there being head injury she had to undergo a long treatment. Statement of the witnesses were recorded under Section 161 of the Cr.P.C. and seizures of articles were made. After completion of the investigation charge sheet was filed before the concerned Court.
3
submits that the prosecution has proved its case beyond reasonable doubt. Therefore, the appeal may be dismissed.
Sd/- (Rajendra Chandra Singh Samant) Judge
Aadil
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the appellant's conviction and sentence by the trial court were erroneous and unsustainable.
Whether the prosecution evidence was reliable and trustworthy to sustain the conviction.
2 provisions across 1 enactments
Moolchand Yadav
State Of Chhattisgarh
Rajendra Chandra Singh Samant
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
