The High Court dismissed the criminal appeal preferred by the appellant challenging his conviction under the NDPS Act. The court held that the trial court correctly convicted the appellant after scrutinizing evidence and found the appeal devoid of substance.
Appeal dismissed; original conviction and sentence upheld.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
Criminal Appeal No. 160 of 2013
Noho Korado S/o Sadashivo Korado Aged About 30 Years R/o Tablaguda, Ps Padampur, Distt. Raigada Orissa, Orissa.
---- Appellant
Versus
State of Chhattisgarh, through Station House Officer, GRP, Distt. Bilaspur C.G. , Chhattisgarh.
---- Respondent
For the Appellant : Shri Ajay Ayachi, Advocate. For the Respondent/ State: Shri Arun Shukla, Dy. A.G.
Hon'ble Shri Justice Rajendra Chandra Singh Samant Judgment on Board
17.01.2019
2
3
the basis of the unbelievable evidence of the prosecution and the prosecution has totally failed to bring the evidence beyond reasonable doubt. It is also submitted that according to the information received, the appellant has undergone whole sentence of imprisonment and he has also paid the fine amount imposed upon him and has been released from jail.
(Rajendra Chandra Singh Samant) Judge
Nimmi
3 issues framed by the court
Whether the prosecution proved charges against the appellant on the basis of evidence beyond reasonable doubt?
Whether the High Court should interfere in the judgment of conviction and sentencing passed by the Special Judge?
Whether the appellant was correctly convicted under Section 20(B)(2)(B) of the NDPS Act despite denied innocence plea?
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Noho Korado S/o Sadashivo Korado
State of Chhattisgarh
Rajendra Chandra Singh Samant
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
