The High Court of Chhattisgarh dismissed the applicant's contempt petition for want of prosecution since no representative appeared after the matter was called in the second round on 01/08/2019.
Petition dismissed for want of prosecution due to non-appearance by the applicant.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
CONT No. 592 of 2017
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
CONT No. 592 of 2017
---- Applicant
Versus
---- Contemnors
2
CONT No. 592 of 2017
For Contemnor Nos. 1 to 3 :- Shri R.K. Gupta, Advocate
Order On Board By Prashant Kumar Mishra, J.
01/08/2019
SD/( Prashant Kumar Mishra ) Judge
Ayushi
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the contempt petition for default in service matters should be dismissed for want of prosecution.
Ku. Durga Dhruv D/o Late Shri Ram Khilavan Dhruv
B. V. R. Subramanyam
A. N. Upadhyay
R. K. Viz
Makardhwaj Pradhan
Prashant Kumar Mishra
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
