Dismissed

Premraj Sharma v. Bhim Singh

Chhattisgarh HC6 Feb 2019CONT/52/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court dismissed the contempt petition (WPC No.2771/2019). The Court directed the petitioner to file a reminder before the Authority within 10 days to decide compensation claims from the previous order within an extended 6-week period, threatening coercive steps if this is not done.

What did the court decide?

Direction to file reminder representation within 10 days; Authority to decide within next 6 weeks.

Premraj Sharma Vs Bhim Singh — Land Acquisition | Chhattisgarh HC (2019)

¶1

NAFR

¶2

HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR

¶3

CONT No.52 of 2019

¶4

Premraj Sharma, S/o Late Bhavar Lal Sharma, aged about 73 Years, R/o Ward No.11, Killapara, Khairagarh, District Rajnandgaon, Chhattisgarh

¶5

---- Petitioner

¶6

Versus

¶7

Bhim Singh, Collector, Rajnandgaon District Rajnandgaon, Chhattisgarh

¶8

P. S. Som, Chief Municipal Officer, Municipal Council Khairagarh, District Rajanandgaon, Chhattisgarh

¶9

---- Respondents

¶10

For Petitioner

¶11

Shri Vivek Singhal, Advocate

¶12

Hon'ble Justice Mr. Prashant Kumar Mishra

¶13

Order On Board

¶14

06/02/2019

¶15

WPC No.2771/2018 was disposed of with the following direction

¶16

contained in para 5 of the order dated 08.10.2018:-

¶17

“5. In the present case, let the petitioners move representation before the Collector, Rajnandgaon with a copy to the Chief Municipal Officer, Municipal Council, Khairagarh for payment of compensation on account of acquisition of their land for widening of road. On such representation being made, the Collector, Rajnandgaon shall decide the representation in consultation with the CMO, Municipal Council, Khairagarh within 6 a period of 8 weeks from the date of submission of representation. If the petitioners' case is found to be similar to the case of Raju Agrawal (supra), the petitioners shall also be entitled to compensation in accordance with law.”

¶18

Since much time has not elapsed after the lapse of the original period, the contempt petition is disposed of with direction and observation that the petitioner shall move reminder/representation before the appropriate Authority within a period of 10 days from today and thereafter the Authority shall decide the representation in terms of the previous order of this Court within next 6 weeks.

¶19

If during the above extended period, the contemnors fail to decide the representation and the petitioner is compelled to move a fresh contempt petition, this Court shall direct personal appearance of the contemnors and may also take coercive steps for compliance of the order passed by this Court.

¶20

Sd/Prashant Kumar Mishra Judge

¶21

Nirala

Premraj Sharma v. Bhim Singh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Premraj Sharma v. Bhim Singh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Ram Gopal Upadhyay Vs State of Chhattisgarh

M/s T. C. Buildcon Pvt. Ltd. Pvt. Ltd. Vs Commissioner Income Tax

Kanhaiya Lal Mahilange Vs State of Chhattisgarh

Jeevesh Sharma Vs Bhim Singh

Surendra Sharma Vs Bhim Singh

Neelendra Sharma Vs Bhim Singh