The application was dismissed for want of prosecution as no counsel appeared on behalf of the applicant and no representation was made even on the second call.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
Order Sheet
CONT. CASE No. 283 of 2019
Kaushalendra Rathor, S/o. Ram Ratan Rathor, Aged About 38 Years, R/o. Krishna Vihar, Q. No. B-1234, N.T.P.C. Colony Jamnipali, Tahsil Katghora, District- Korba, Chhattisgarh.
---- Applicant
Versus
---- Respondents
| 10/05/2019 | None for the Applicant. |
|---|---|
| Mr. H.S. Ahluwaliya, Advocate on behalf of Mr. Chandresh Shrivastava, counsel for the respondents. No one appears nor any representation is made on behalf of the applicant even in the second call, therefore, the Court has left with no other option except to dismiss the petition for want of prosecution. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed for want of prosecution. Sd/- (Rajendra Chandra Singh Samant) Judge |
|
| balram |
Kaushalendra Rathor
Raghunandan Prasad Sharma
Vishwas Bais
Omi Nirala
Rajendra Chandra Singh Samant
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
