Dismissed

Prabhash Kumar Joshi v. H.N.Hiradhar

Chhattisgarh HC14 May 2019CONT/224/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In this contempt petition alleging noncompliance of a previous order regarding grant of increments, the Court held that the respondents' reconsideration and rejection of the claim constituted due compliance. The Court reserved the petitioner's right to appeal against the rejection via writ jurisdiction and disposed of the contempt petition.

What did the court decide?

The Contempt Petition stands disposed off.

Prabhash Kumar Joshi Vs H.N.Hiradh… — Constitutional and Fundamental Rights | Chhattisgarh HC (2019)

¶1

-1-

¶2

NAFR

¶3

HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR

¶4

CONT No. 224 of 2019

¶5

Prabhash Kumar Joshi S/o Late Bisahuram Joshi, Aged About 50 Years R/o Ashok Nagar, Bilaspur, District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh

¶6

		Versus	---- Petitioner
1. H.N. Hiradhar Chhattisgarh	District	Education Officer,	District Bilaspur ---Respondent
For Applicant	:	Mr. Varun Sharma,	Advocate.
For Respondent	:	Mr. Mayank Kumar Dhiraj Ku. Wankhe	on behalf of Mr. de, Advocate.

¶7

Hon'ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy Order on Board

¶8

14/05/2019

¶9

The present Contempt Petition has been filed alleging noncompliance of the Order dated 10.08.2018 passed in W.P.S 1054 of 2017 by this Court.

¶10

Perusal of the records would show that the direction given by the Court was to consider the case of the petitioner for grant of two advance increments on successful completion of the B.Ed. Course after appointment on own expenses, (Annexure C/2) is enclosed with the contempt petition would reveal that after the Order passed by this Court on 10.08.2018, the respondents have vide their order dated 05.11.2018 considered the case of the petitioner and rejected the claim.

¶11

Given the facts, that the respondents have considered the case of the petitioner and have reached to the conclusion that he is not entitled for the benefit. This Court is of the view that the compliance

¶12

-2-

¶13

so far as the direction given by the respondents stands duly complied with. Whether the findings by the respondents in their order dated 05.11.2018 is proper, legal, justified or not? Is one which could be decided by this Court only under the writ jurisdiction and cannot be looked into under the contempt jurisdiction.

¶14

The Contempt Petition stands disposed off, reserving the right of the petitioner to assail the Order dated 05.11.2018, if the petitioner so feels.

¶15

Accordingly, the Contempt Petition stands disposed off.

¶16

Sd/(P. Sam Koshy) Judge

¶17

Rahul

Prabhash Kumar Joshi v. H.N.Hiradhar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Prabhash Kumar Joshi v. H.N.Hiradhar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sushil Kumar Banchhor Vs State Of Chhattisgarh

Mahendra Ram Yadav Vs State Of Chhattisgarh

Chandra Prakash Sahu Vs State of Chhattisgarh

Smt. Rameshwari Ashish Banjara Vs State of Chhattisgarh

Santosh Kumar Kashyap Vs Harijeet Singh Hura

Pravin Mishra Vs H. N. Hiradhar